WorkBeacon Business · evidence before automation

Find a clearer path for your work.

A short, practical check to help you see where repetitive work may be simpler, more effective and more focused — without calls, meetings or sales pressure.

◷About 5 minutes
✓No call required
↗Evidence before automation
Start your complimentary check →Practical insight. No obligation.
Three possible outcomes

Practical next steps, not guesswork.

The point is not to automate everything. It is to identify what deserves attention, what needs better evidence and what should simply be made easier first.

🍃

Simplify first

Spot work that is too messy, exception-heavy or overcomplicated to automate safely.

▥

Measure first

See where better evidence would help before spending time or money on a solution.

◎

Deeper map

Identify structured repetitive work that may justify a more detailed process review.

WorkBeacon POL · founding canary

Put a control layer around one AI agent before you give it more authority.

POL is WorkBeacon's deterministic control technology for separating model output from verified state, permission and proof that an action actually completed. The founding pilot applies that control layer to one existing tool-using AI agent or workflow and returns a written before/after evidence pack.

≡

Truth and state

Keep current, unknown, stale and completed state explicit instead of letting plausible model prose overwrite what is actually known.

⌁

Bounded authority

Require exact, explicit permission for consequential actions. Context, memory and model confidence do not grant authority.

✓

Completion proof

Claims such as done, sent, paid or published require trusted receipts rather than being accepted because the model says they happened.

AI Agent Control Pilot — powered by POL

Founding canary: £750 fixed

For an AI agency, SaaS team or small business already running one tool-using agent or workflow. Scope is confirmed in writing before any commitment; no sales call is required.

Included
  • One existing agent/workflow control review
  • Truth/state and authority-boundary map
  • POL mediation applied to the agreed control surface
  • Hostile-output and false-completion checks
  • Written defect, control and next-step evidence pack
Evidence boundary
  • POL v1.1 has exact-head hosted qualification
  • 40 hostile-output containment cases passed with 0 deterministic-boundary escapes
  • No claim of legal, regulatory or security compliance
  • No guarantee of commercial uplift or zero future defects
  • Production/customer-system writes remain separately authorised
1 · Written fit check

Confirm that one existing tool-using workflow has a real truth, authority or completion-control problem worth testing.

2 · Lock one workflow

Freeze the agreed control surface, evidence sources, permissions and acceptance criteria before any intervention.

3 · Run the bounded pilot

Apply the agreed controls and test hostile output, unsupported state changes and false-completion behaviour.

4 · Evidence pack + decision

Return observed defects, controls, test evidence and a continue / change / stop recommendation. Continuation is not assumed.

One workflow. One bounded pilot. One decision. If the evidence does not justify further work, the recommendation is to stop rather than manufacture an upsell.

Request the written fit check →See full pilot scope →Founding price is a commercial-validation canary, not a proven market-clearing price.
Friction Check

Find the friction before you automate it.

No guaranteed savings claims. No automatic outreach. This is a first-pass operational diagnostic.

This tool estimates operational time from figures you provide. It does not claim guaranteed financial savings or recommend automation when simplification or measurement should come first.

Your result

Weekly hours tied up
Annual hours estimate
Evidence confidence